![]() |
| An image from History Channel shows the Battle of New Orleans, one of the last battles in the War of 1812. |
In HOA, we have recently addressed thoroughly the War of 1812 and the events leading up to this. This corresponds to the question, "Should the United States have gone to war in 1812?"
I believe the United States should not have gone to war in 1812 against Britain because in the end none of the original problems were resolved, the economy was already struggling, and the war was bound to cause unnecessary American deaths due to the experience and numbers in the British army.
In 1812, the economy of the United States was suffering and plummeting due to issues within the Articles of the Confederation, the main issue being that the government was not allowed to directly tax. The lack of money in the government led to soldiers not being payed, which further caused protests and riots all over the United States. An example of this is Shay's Rebellion, where ex-soldiers in Massachusetts were not paid at all or in full for their service. The rebellion involved violent attacks on courthouses and government buildings, demanding money. Also, America has just implemented the Embargo Act, stopping all exports from US ports. This caused all foreign income to halt while merchants and their families were suffering without money and were angry at the United States for practically taking away their jobs and only source of income. Due to an economy in downfall caused by the Embargo Act and lack of direct taxation, the United States was not prepared economically for the price of war.
The US should not have gone to war against Britain in 1812 also because the great numbers and experience of the British military heavily outweighed the weak US militia. This weakness would inevitably lead to many unnecessary deaths of American servicemen because they were purely outnumbered and many had never fought in a battle before. The British were ending their war against Napoleon, so it is fair to say that mostly all of their soldiers had experience against one of the largest military powers in the world, France. The US militia consisted of farmers, merchants, and other inexperienced men who fought either because they needed a job or their patriotism. At the beginning of the war, the British had a whopping 245,000 men while the United States had a depressing 7,000. Throughout the war the US gained men but still did not come close to the number the British had, so declaring war with only a tiny fraction of the men the opposing army had was going to inevitably lead to slaughtering of Americans on the battlefields by the British.
Lastly, looking back on the War of 1812 proves the United States should have never declared war on Britain because in the end, none of the original issues changed. A main cause of the war was impressment of US military. This was when the British would capture American men on ships and force them to serve for the British military. They would often say that the American sailor was British originally and turned to the American side, so they must come back and serve for Britain. This angered Americans and caused the US military to lose even more men, narrowing down their minuscule starting numbers. At the Treaty of Ghent, the treaty that ended the war, the act of impressment was not addressed and the British continued to do it, even after the war was over. Another cause of the war was that the United States wanted Canada, which the British currently owned. The British defended Canada greatly because it housed most of their forts on North American soil, so they would not give up this land easily because it meant they would have mostly no grip on North America. The United States could barely defend their own land from the British and angered Native Americans, so the thought of expanding into Canada was not possible from the start. Once again, at the Treaty of Ghent, the issue of Canadian territory in US hands was not addressed and the British continued to dominate Canada. Therefore, the as reflection on history occurs, it is evident the United States should not have declared war on Britain in 1812 because none of the main issues causing the war would be solved or addressed at the end of the war.
Overall, the United States should not have gone into the War of 1812 because the economy was not ready for war, the British greatly outnumbered the Americans, and in the end none of the main causes of the war would be solved. The war was not an American or British victory because nothing changed, so going to was was pointless. Thousands of lives would have been saved without it and the diplomatic results would have been the same.

Hey Allie! I think you chose a really good topic and I liked reading it. Your three main points that you laid out in your body paragraphs were strong, and you provided good evidence to support them. At a few times, there was some off phrases or spelling, but on the whole this was well argued!
ReplyDeleteI thought this post was very detailed and well explained. The arguments were solid and well supported. Also, the way you formatted your arguments and opinions made the post flow really well and made it very easy to follow. You could have explained the other side (pro-war) a little more to strengthen your argument even more, but overall, I enjoyed reading it!
ReplyDeleteI thought this was very well developed and contained relevant information which made it coherent. I also think the structure was well planned out which allowed it to be understandable and logical. Personally, when discussing this topic in HOA I believed that the U.S. should have gone to war against Britain in 1812 but should have taken more time to develop and strengthen the army and the country as a whole. But, after reading your post I have to say that many of your arguments made me question and change my own beliefs. Overall, it was well written and comprehensible.
ReplyDeleteI thought that the topic of the War of 1812 was very good. It is a real use of what we are currently learning in history. The use of varying events that impacted the war showed that your did your research and used prior knowledge to explain your opinion. The conclusion also was very well put together to wrap up the entire essay.
ReplyDeleteI enjoyed reading this perspective on this side of the arguement immensely as it is noted I don't fully agree. I appreciated the extensive use of facts and background knowledge to the war of 1812, it helped set the stage for a good persuasive post. Although I did like it it seemed somewhat repetitive and I would've loved to see some opposing viewpoints to strengthen your argument.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeletePostings provide moderate insight, understanding and reflective thought about the topic. (3)
Postings present a focused and cohesive viewpoint that is substantiated by effective supporting examples or links to relevant, up-to-date websites or documents that enhance the information presented. (4)
Postings are generally well written with some attempts made to stimulate dialogue and commentary. (3)
Postings are written in a style that is appealing and appropriate for the intended audience and a consistent voice is evident throughout. (4)
Postings reflect a bit of the author’s personality through word choices that attempt to bring the topic to life. (3)
All images, media and text created by others display appropriate copyright permissions and accurate citations. (4) - ACT Style
Written responses are largely free of grammatical, spelling or punctuation errors. The style of writing generally facilitates communication. (3)
24/28